School Improvement Plan
What is a School Improvement Plan?
A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.
Key Points of a SIP:
- Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
- Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
- Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.
Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.
Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.
District - School Improvement Plans

Clark Elementary School Improvement Plan
2024-2026
Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities
- What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
- What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
- What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
What school strengths support belonging, well-being, and learning?
What challenges are you working to address, especially in closing gaps?
What future opportunities will you use to improve and address inequities?
Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality
ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities.
ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following:
- Institutional racism and ableism
- Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education
- Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)
- Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs
- Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs
Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education
Reflection & Theory of Action
- What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
- What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
What new practices are improving student achievement, and how are you tracking their impact?
What steps are you taking to address inequities in student achievement?
Backed by Data
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.
School-Based Action Plan
Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.
Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c
Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a
Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning. ISD Priority 1
Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b
Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential. ISD Priority 2b
| Action | Implementation | Impact: Evidence/Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
|
Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy |
Training
Teaming Teams will meet to review Benchmark Advance assessment data and implications for implementation centered on the following questions:
Integrity of Delivery
Resources Allocation
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
| Inclusionary Practices |
Professional Development
Curriculum Adaptation
Instructional Teams
Resource Allocation
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling |
Math Pre-Assessments
Benchmark Assessments
Success Blocks
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Additional School Improvement Plan Components |
||
|
Family engagement |
Family Needs Assessment
Providing Childcare
Home Visits
Title Night
Communication
PTA Events
Clark Closet
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
|
Technology Integration |
Student Needs Assessment
Collaborative Learning
Student Expression & Creativity
Data Monitoring
|
Intended Impacts
Key Data
|
School Improvement Team & Procedure Information
|
Principal |
Christy Otley |
|---|---|
|
SIP Team Members |
Amy Hoell – Kindergarten Danielle Nourigat – 1st Grade Megan Bissen – 2nd Grade Madeline Heywood – 3rd Grade Jennifer Giambrone – 4th Grade/Equity Lead Laura Cramer – 5th Grade Jill Phillips – MTSS Specialist Hannah Niblock – Counselor Laura Gacayan – Title Teacher Eve Yen – Assistant Principal
|
|
Supervisor Review |
November 13, 2024 Melinda Reynvaan |
|
Site Council or PTSA Review |
November 12, 2024 |
|
School Board Review |
Dec. 11 2024 |